27Jun/22Off

AE4HF’s covid vaccine mandate fight is a misdirection scam!

Marty Watters, Investigative reporter

Pastor David Hogan

Airline Employees 4 Health Freedom (AE4HF) is making the case in court that United Airlines employees of faith should be exempt from taking the covid jab.

But the group's religious exemption fight is just a misdirection tactic in order to keep the focus off the fact that everyone, not just people of faith, are already exempt from being forced to inject any experimental drug into their bodies.

Yeah, that exemption is a little thing called the Nuremberg Code.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejm199711133372006

That prohibition has been codified in U.S. law.

That's why combating illegal vaccine mandates on the grounds of religious exemptions is foolish and unnecessary. It's also exactly what the World Economic Forum and Deep State scumbags want us to do.

Case in point: Watch United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby intentionally bait people into the religious exemption fight.

What Kirby did in this 22 second video was distract attention from the fact that all of the covid vaccines are experimental and unsafe by making the discussion about people's faith.

It's a slick tactic that Deep State snakes deploy all the time.

By making their case about religion, AE4HF is allowing United Airlines and its government partners to escape the pitfalls of having to produce evidence that the untested drugs United is forcing on its employees are safe and effective. 

Keep this in mind:  United Airlines now requires all new employees to have been injected with the experimental "vaccines".

Is United saying that people of faith need not apply?

Yes.

They are also telling everyone else who cares if the vaccines are safe. Just shut up and do what you are told!

Did United Airlines study the safety record of these vaccines?

Of course not.

Is United Airlines liable for the harm the vaccines are already causing to its employees?

These are just a few of the many questions that should have been asked before Scott Kirby and United Airlines were able to scam people into thinking this was just a question of faith.

The debate over vaccines must be first and foremost about the health and safety of the individuals receiving the jabs, not their religious beliefs.

And I can tell you this with certainty from first hand experience: Scott Kirby does not give a rat's ass about the health and saftey of United Airlines employees.

Next up. AE4HF partnered with a religious charlatan!

15Mar/22Off

Sambrano v. United Airlines: AE4HF is not what it pretends to be!

Marty Watters, Investigative reporter


Airline Employees 4 Health Freedom (AE4HF) pretend to be a righteous group of do-gooders fighting for religious freedom against tyrants like United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby. The groups purported cause is to defeat United Airlines' employee vaccine mandate.


Sounds like a good cause, right? But confusingly they seem to want to lose.


Could it be that they are getting bad legal advice from their high-priced lawyers?


It sure looks that way considering the behavior of those same lawyers lately.


For example, AE4HF credits lead attorney John Sullivan with putting together its legal team for Sambarano v. United Airlines,  which includes attorneys from K Street lobbyist law firm Schaerr Jaffe in Washington, DC and Stewat Wiegand & Owens, PC out of Texas. Sullivan is the sole attorney at at little law firm, S/L Law PLLC, which operates out of a virtual office service located in Cedar Hill, Texas. 


But something is fishy here.Turns out that up until the day before AE4HF filed its lawsuit against United, S/L Law did not exist! And prior to that, the only firm John Sullivan ever worked for was Morgan Lewis & Bockius (MLB).


This is important because MLB's clients include both United Airlines and Pfizer - both want United employees to take the jab. Could that be why Sullivan does not name MLB in his S/L Law bio, and just said he was "a veteran of one of the world's largest law firms"?


Why would Sullivan erase his history at MLB? Sullivan won't say. In fact, no one at MLB or on the AE4HF team will answer any questions at all.
Is John Sullivan and his newly-formed law firm just a cut-out to hide the involvement of Morgan Lewis & Bockius? Sure looks like it.


Seems my questions have really struck a nerve. And even though they won't answer my questions, AE4HF and their lawyers are reacting to them like children throwing tantrums. For example, I contacted Robert Wiegand of Stewart Wiegand & Owens, PC and the minute I said who I was, he told me, "I have nothing to say to you. Go f**k off," and hung up.
Or take the truly bizarre emotional meltdown of David Hogan, AE4HF spokesperson and good friend of John Sullivan, when I questioned why he took down his YouTube podcast calling Senator Ted Cruz a liar and member of the Deep-State. 


After the email exchange above,  Hogan came to accept the fact that a recording of the Janurary 13th podcast was about to be published, so he immediately put his broadcast back up on YouTube. The really comical thing is that at the 17:40 minute mark, Hogan credits me for his decision to call Senator Cruz out in the first place. Really, you could not make shit like this up!

Hogan never really wanted to call Cruz out. And when he did, the video was only up for approximately 24 hours. Roughly 30 minutes after I sent the YouTube link toTed Cruz and asked him for a comment, Hogan made the YouTube video private and removed it from the archives.
I guess the AE4HF clan was none too happy with Hogan speaking the truth about Senator Cruz. That's understandable, considering that AE4HF was hailing Cruz as a hero for his so-called grilling of United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby on vaccine mandates during a Senate Commerce Committee hearing December 15, 2021.

That was not a grilling!. It was Cruz putting on a meaningless performance, the kind you get from Deep State Rino like Lindsey Graham. And I wrote about it here:
https://illinoispaytoplay.com/apparently-senator-ted-cruz-is-for-vaccine-mandates/

Is it just a coincidence that when Ted Cruz was a lawyer in the private sector, he was a partner at Morgan Lewis & Bockius? Or that AE4HF lead attorney Sullivan while with MLB donated over $13k to Senator Cruz's 2016 presidential campaign.

Luckily for Sullivan, after leaving MLB and starting his new law firm, cash flow has not been a problem due to the fact that the do-gooder folks at AE4HF agreed to pay all the lawyer's fees for Sambrano v United Airlines up front rather than handling it the typical way lawyers get paid in a class action lawsuit, which is on contingency. That’s where the lawyers get paid only if they win the case.

Why did the lawyers insist AE4HF pay the fees up front? Could it be that the lawyers planned on filing weak legal arguments in court and knew they were very unlikely to win the case?

And why would AE4HF agree to do so?

No doubt the fact that they are paying the lawyers with other people's money made that an easy decision!

And why is AE4HF hiding donation amounts to givetosend? 

Are you beginning to see a pattern here?

Until AE4HF starts answering some questions, no one should donate a single penny to them! After all, you could very well be funding the Deep State nefarious plans for us all.

Much more to come!!!